Nutrient Levels (Phosphorus & Nitrogen)
1. Indigenous perspectives
2. Overview
3. What we’ve learned
4. Implications
5. What can I do?
6. Related indicators
7. Related community stories
Illustrations by Victoria Ransom. See all HERE
High levels of nutrients can lead to an abundance of plants and algae—photo by Stephany Hildebrand.
High levels of nutrients can lead to an abundance of plants and algae—photo by Stephany Hildebrand.
Overview
Mucky water, excessive plant growth, algal blooms, and fish kills might be some of the concerns you have when you think of the health of the river. Common causes for all these issues are related to the levels of nutrients in the water.
What exactly do we mean by nutrients? When we talk about nutrients, we are generally talking about two elements, phosphorus and nitrogen. Both of these elements provide essential food for plants, which in turn support fish and other animals in the river.
Although nutrients exist naturally in the environment, humans often add extra nutrients to lakes and rivers through fertilizer runoff, sewage from our homes, and wastewater from industries. Too much of these nutrients can lead to problems, including green mats of plants and algae, low oxygen levels and even dangerous toxins in the water. These issues can affect ecosystem health and recreational activities on the water, like swimming and boating.
Having too few nutrients can also have serious consequences for aquatic ecosystems. Extremely low nutrient levels can reduce the growth of plants and algae that are important food sources for many aquatic organisms including insects and fish.
Many changes have occurred in the river, including new laws, the introduction of invasive species, and shifts in our climate. What impacts have these changes had on nutrient levels in the river? What should we expect for future nutrient levels in the river? These are some of the questions that the Great River Rapport team set out to try to answer for this indicator. Below is a summary of some of the key findings from our research.Â
What We’ve Learned
- Phosphorus declined following the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement
Starting in the 1930s nutrient levels in the Great Lakes began to increase. By the 1970s, nutrient pollution and harmful algal blooms had become a major concern in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River. In response, the Canadian and United States governments signed the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement in 1972. This agreement led to laws that decreased the amount of phosphorus in detergents and improved municipal and industrial wastewater treatment. As a result, the river had become visibly clearer by the 1980s, shifting from mucky water, with high nutrient levels, to clearer water, with low nutrient levels.
- The introduction of invasive mussels made the river more clear
If you’ve spent time on the river, you may have memories of cutting your feet on mussel shells. These sharp shells come from zebra and quagga mussels, invasive species that are both native to Eurasia. Zebra mussels were first found in the St. Lawrence River in 1989 and were shortly followed by their cousin, the quagga mussel. Although they are small, they can have major impacts on ecosystems—a single zebra mussel can filter up to 3 litres of water each day!
Through filter feeding, zebra and quagga mussels absorb large amounts of phosphorus from the water. So, as their populations grew, they absorbed more phosphorus and made the water clearer. These changes have also been noted through observations of water clarity by community members like local diver, Ron Macdonald.
It is important for us to pay attention to this continued decline of phosphorus because levels are now lower than they were before industrial development. While clear water may seem like healthy water, too little nutrients and algae can also be a problem for ecosystems. Phosphorus is an important food for plants and algae, which in turn feed fish and other animals. If nutrient levels drop too low, it can impact other species in the river, as we found in the case of Yellow Perch.
- Nitrogen levels started
to decline in the early 2000sÂ
There are two main nutrients that are important for feeding all life in the river: phosphorus and nitrogen. Unlike phosphorus, nitrogen was not a focus in the 1972 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. While phosphorus levels went down, we found that nitrogen levels went up until about 2000 and then started to decline in the mid 2000s.
This was a surprising finding that hasn’t been previously documented in the river. Researchers are still looking into different reasons why this is happening.
The decline in nitrogen follows zebra and quagga mussel invasion. Nitrogen is an important ingredient in making mussel shells. As the invasive mussel population grew, more shells were made and left behind in the water. Instead of the nitrogen being recycled and available in the water, it is now stored in the shells of mussels. More research is needed to determine if this could explain the decline in nitrogen levels.Â
- Nearshore and tributary
nutrients are still high
While nutrients in the main channel (deeper water) of the river are declining, there is a different story for the river’s nearshore areas and tributaries (small rivers and creeks). The nearshore area runs along the shoreline and provides habitat for birds, fish, and other wildlife. The nearshore area is also the part of the river that is directly impacted by human activity on the land.
Although nutrient levels in the main channel of the river are currently very low, they are much higher in the nearshore area. One reason for this difference is that nutrients from runoff and local tributaries tend to concentrate in nearshore areas.
Another reason for this difference, which might come as a surprise, is the introduction of invasive mussels. The large invasive mussel populations are concentrated along the edges of rivers and lakes. Through their filter feeding the mussels capture nutrients and trap them in this nearshore zone.
- Climate change is linked to
higher nutrient levels
Climate change is a major threat to aquatic ecosystems globally and we are already seeing impacts on the St. Lawrence River. Climate change varies regionally and is reshaping local weather and ecosystems, with impacts expected to intensify in the coming decades.Â
Climate projections suggest that spring may bring warmer-than-average temperatures along with intense rainfall and strong storms, leading to high water surges and increased surface runoff. These conditions can increas nutrient levels in the St. Lawrence River, particularly nitrogen, as rain can wash fertilizers from agricultural lands into the water.
Projections indicate that summers could be much warmer—by as much as 2 to 4 degrees Celsius by 2040—with years of extreme drought. Increased temperatures can encourage algal blooms and trigger the release of phosphorus stored in the sediments of lakes and rivers.
Implications
Although nutrient levels in offshore waters are at new lows, in many nearshore areas they remain above water quality guidelines. High levels of nutrients in nearshore areas lead to algal blooms. When the algae dies, it washes to shore in mats that smell bad and clog up beaches. Certain types of algae can also release toxins that are harmful to human and wildlife health. Algae growth in nearshore areas can decrease oxygen levels in the water, with negative impacts for native species, including species-at-risk.
We can help to reduce nutrients in nearshore waters by planting native vegetation along shorelines and using agricultural best management practices such as adding windbreaks and planting cover crops. We also recommend continuing efforts to upgrade sewage systems and continuing to monitor nutrient levels in all sections of the river, especially in nearshore areas. Knowing that climate change will have major impacts on all elements of the health of the St. Lawrence River, we also need to continue to prioritize reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
What can I do?

Water rangers
You can monitor water quality in your area with Water Rangers monitoring kits. Water quality monitoring can contribute to future research on water quality in the St. Lawrence River.Â

DataStream
DataStream provides data on water quality throughout our region. Click on a location and see past data which has been recorded, or click on “explainer” to learn more about water quality parameters.Â

Watershed Canada
Watershed Canada’s Love Your Lake is a shoreline evaluation program which works with waterfront landowners to recommend actions for improving watershed health.

ALUS
ALUS Ontario East works with farmers and ranchers to reduce the environmental impacts of their lands through implementing projects that best suit their farming operations.Â
Learn More

Watershed Reports
Water Rangers produced the 2025 Canada Watershed Reports, you can explore the report to see how the St. Lawrence River scored for water quality, water flow, invertebrates and fish.Â

RRCA Watershed Monitoring
The Raisin Region Conservation Authority provides a variety of programming to enhance water quality and environmental health in the Lake St. Francis watershed. You can check out their watershed monitoring reports cards to learn about the health of each tributary in the watershed.

Environment and Climate Change Canada
Environment and Climate Change Canada provides scores for their monitoring stations along the St. Lawrence River, along with an explanation of the impact of these findings.

Healthy River and Thriving Farms
The Healthy River and Thriving Farms Storymap provides insights on nutrient hotspots in the Lake St. Francis watershed. Produced by the River Institute.
https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/ec4eb92428cc4ed1a90b2f150b174c34

Jefferson County Soil and Water Conservation District
Jefferson County Soil and Water Conservation District provides programming for agriculture, water quality, forest management and stormwater along the south shore of the Thousand Islands.
READ REPORT
Yellow Perch
CHECK PROGRESS
Agricultural Practices/Runoff
CHECK PROGRESS
Zebra/Quagga Mussel

















































